Sunday, February 15, 2015

Food labeling through time



              Over the course of the last 150 years our food labels have undergone drastic changes. If we go all the way back to the 13th century we will find the first steps toward food labeling. When the king of England made a proclamation of The Assize of Bread, which basically stated that bakers could no longer add ground peas and beans into their bread mix. Moving forward to modern times with President Lincolns Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Chemistry (the predecessor of the FDA). We see the first large scale attempt of government regulatory organizations. Jumping ahead again to 1971 we see the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) adding saccharin to its list of GRAS or (generally recognized as safe).  In 1977 we see the first and sadly not the last demonstration of the power that big industry hold over political policies. The Saccharin Study and Labeling Act is passed by Congress, this act stops the FDA from banning saccharin. This act does however require that any food that contains saccharin to be labeled stating that saccharin had been found to cause cancer in laboratory animals. In 1990 the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act is passed. This is where the labels we see today first come into fruition. The NLEA requires foods to have nutrition labels, and that any health claim to be consistent with the terms set by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. In 2010 nutrition labels only need to consider 4 main nutrients as directed by the Institute of Medicine. Calories, Saturated Fat, Trans-Fat, and Sodium are the 4 nutrients that are to be considered. Also in 2010 the USDA requires meat to show nutrition data starting in early 2012. As of 2014 the FDA has proposed changes to nutrition labels of food. Some of these changes are to focus more on calories, update the serving sizes and to change how sugar is displayed. Specifically to have the serving sizes more in line with actual consumption values, and to have added sugar shown apart from natural occurring sugar.
                The FDA has many guidelines for food labels, such as just how much space of the package is devoted to the nutrition labels. The location and placement label statements, and getting as nitty gritty as to what fonts can be used, the font size of greater the 1/16th of an inch based on the lowercase letter "o". Looking at the nutrition label itself we can see 6 main areas; the Serving Size, Calories, area 3 and 4 are lumped together into the Nutrient Section, the Footnote Section, and finely the Percent Daily Value area. The serving size area is the guideline for the calorie and nutrition sections. Depending on how many servings the consumer is going to consume determines what the other areas must be multiplied by in order to obtain an accurate measure. For instance, if the consumer is going to have 2 servings then the total calories of the food must be multiplied by 2. The Calorie section contains both total calories and the amount of Calories from Fat. This area requires simple division to determine the percentage of from fat that the calories are coming from. The Nutrient section is broken into two parts. The first part is the nutrients that should be limited, such as Total Fat which has subdivisions of Saturated Fat and Trans Fat. Also Cholesterol and Sodium are included in this section. The other part is the nutrients that we should get enough of. This is where the Vitamins and Fiber percentages are located. The Footnote section does not always need to be included, if for example the label were to be too small. The Footnote area contains the Daily Recommended Values for a 2000 calorie and 2500 calorie diet. The last section is the Percent daily Values that are contained in the package. These values are based on the Recommended Values from the Footnote section.
                 Food labels give a lot of information that is necessary for making healthy choices of what we consume. They have changed drastically over the last few years, and will continue to change as the battle between industrial food and public health continues to wage on. It will be interesting to see how nutrient labels will change over the next 10 years.